Most MySQL users have tried getting this rather cryptic error message: “MySQL server has gone away”. The MySQL documentation describes lots of possible reasons for this here: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/gone-away.html
However this page is of little help for most users, I think. Dozens of reasons are listed, but except for the trivial ones (like physical connection was lost, the MySQL server or the machine where it runs has crashed etc.) there are a few reasons for this that are very common in our experience and a lot of those mentioned are not.
But the documentation at
.. also lists another client error:
Error: 2020 (CR_NET_PACKET_TOO_LARGE) Message: Got packet bigger than ‘max_allowed_packet’ bytes
Error: 2006 (CR_SERVER_GONE_ERROR): Message: MySQL server has gone away.
Actually I have not seen the ‘got packet bigger ..’ error myself for many years. Not since MySQL 3.23 or 4.0. I am uncertain if a recent server will sometimes still return ‘got packet bigger’ or not or if also this error message itself has ‘gone away’. If the ‘got packet bigger’ message is still relevant with recent servers it would be nice to have it specified under what conditions it occurs and when only ‘gone away’ will. If this error mesage is now ‘historical’ it should at least be removed from documentation or it should be mentioned that the error no. is reserved for this message – but not used anymore. But it would of course be much preferable to have the ‘got packet bigger’ error returned if that is the problem. It tells what the problem is – “MySQL server has gone away” does not tell anything specific. So ‘got packet bigger’ is a *much* better message than ‘gone away’. Also ‘got packet bigger’ is listed among client errors and not server errors what I would expect. So maybe some problem with my understanding of things here?
Does anybody have any idea about if and why ‘got packet bigger’ now effectively seems to have ‘gone away’ too?
And most important: why disconnect the client? There are reconnect options of course, but it does not really help here. After a reconnect and executing the same query things just repeat themselves.
Basically I never understood why MySQL stick with the default 1M setting for [mysqld] when it is 16M for [mysqldump] in configuration ‘templates’ shipped with the MySQL server (I have tried to ‘hint’ them several times over the last 3-4 years). Obviously they realize that 1M is often too little for backup/restore since they use a larger setting for mysqldump. However users use all other sorts of tools for backup: other script-based tools running on the server, third-party (and MySQL) GUI clients, web-based tools (hosting control panels, phpMyAdmin), backup/restore routines shipping with or built-in applications etc. Often users do not have access to run mysqldump at all on hosted servers (at least not if they are shared servers). Further often Sysadmins are unwilling to change configuration settings and users are left with the option to generate SINGLE INSERTS – with horrible restore performance as a consequence – to ensure cross-server exports/imports (and still it fails with a well-grown MEDIUMBLOB). I deliberately use the term ‘exports/imports’ and not ‘backup/restore’ because it also applies to various tools that can connect to two or more servers at a time and copy data using various techniques without actually generating a file.
The max_allowed_packet problem as described here has been a big problem for us over time. I do not think MySQL fully realises the importance of the problem – mostly because our tools and the tools/clients shipped with the server respectively are used primarily by different segments of users (with some significant overlapping of course). We handle this problem now 100% in SQLyog (we generate the largest BULK INSERTS possible up to 16M everywhere when transferring data from one server to another with all the methods available) but we cannot prevent user – if he wants to use BULK INSERTS – to generate a SQL-DUMP on one server that will not import another because BULK INSERTS are too large. We will of course only be able to handle it if we are connected to both servers.
And actually – and most basically – I also do not really understand why a max_allowed_packet setting is required at all – except that it makes sense of course that a server admin should be able to restrict not-well-behaving users in bombing the server with statements containing 1 GB large WHERE-clauses! But then we are not talking about 1M but rather something like 16-64-100M as a critical threshold, I think.
Also I am not sure if the reason is that the setting is used to allocate a fixed-size memory buffer for handling the query string or if it is related to handling network packages or whatever. I just wondered for quite some time if such restriction could not be avoided and whether this implementation is a deliberate choice for some reason or rather some consequence of coding techniques used currently. I would like to get rid of it!